Theme for the conference: Jumping off the (Leg)islation. The spirit behind this theme is moving forward in our new Canadian copyright environment – methods, issues and ideas.
Our keynote speakers are:
Kimberley Christen Withey, Associate Professor and Associate Director of the Digital Technology and Culture program, Department of English, Washington State University
Topic: Copyright and Traditional Knowledge
Paul Stacy, Associate Director of Global Learning for Creative Commons
Topic: The ABC's of CC - Using Creative Commons (CC) to generate a global public commons of knowledge and culture
The conference program is available at: http://conferences.uvic.ca/public/conferences/37/schedConfs/58/program-en_US.pdf
EARLY BIRD registration closes on April 18: http://conferences.uvic.ca/index.php/abccopyright/abccopyright2014/schedConf/registration
Location: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC Canada.
We’d love to see you at the conference!
Dr. Lawrence Lessig of Harvard Law School, successfully defends his use of snippets of music from the Australian band, Phoenix, in his YouTube lecture. Via eff.org, @creativecommons
Gillian Shaw | Vancouver Sun | February 29, 2014
"Canadians who illegally download music, movies and other copyright material may no longer be able to hide from potential lawsuits.
In a groundbreaking decision released Thursday by Canada’s Federal Court, the Internet service provider TekSavvy Solutions was ordered to release to Voltage Pictures LLC the names and addresses of more than 2,000 Internet users suspected of pirating movies..."
As reported by Creative Commons, the Google Image search tools now allow you to filter images by usage rights - making it much easier to find copyright friendly images for your teaching needs. Cool indeed!
Keep in mind, though, just because someone has posted an image, that doesn't mean they own it or have the right to license it. Some websites are kind enough to grant permission for images they didn't have the right to use in the first place. So for instance, the open-license pictures I just found of "the Fonze", or Garfield, or Tony the Tiger - even though marked for free re-use - probably doesn't belong to the facebook blogger who posted it. There is still room for a critical eye when using images on the web.
Here's the Legalese: (from the Canadian Copyright Act)
30.04 (1) Subject to subsections (2) to (5), it is not an infringement of copyright for an educational institution, or a person acting under the authority of one, to do any of the following acts for educational or training purposes in respect of a work or other subject-matter that is available through the Internet:
(a) reproduce it;
(b) communicate it to the public by telecommunication, if that public primarily consists of students of the educational institution or other persons acting under its authority;
(c) perform it in public, if that public primarily consists of students of the educational institution or other persons acting under its authority; or
(d) do any other act that is necessary for the purpose of the acts referred to in paragraphs (a) to (c).
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply unless the educational institution or person acting under its authority, in doing any of the acts described in that subsection in respect of the work or other subject-matter, mentions the following:
(a) the source; and
(b) if given in the source, the name of
(i) the author, in the case of a work,
(ii) the performer, in the case of a performer’s performance,
(iii) the maker, in the case of a sound recording, and
(iv) the broadcaster, in the case of a communication signal.
(3) Subsection (1) does not apply if the work or other subject-matter — or the Internet site where it is posted — is protected by a technological protection measure that restricts access to the work or other subject-matter or to the Internet site.
(4) Subsection (1) does not permit a person to do any act described in that subsection in respect of a work or other subject-matter if
(a) that work or other subject-matter — or the Internet site where it is posted — is protected by a technological protection measure that restricts the doing of that act; or
(b) a clearly visible notice — and not merely the copyright symbol — prohibiting that act is posted at the Internet site where the work or other subject-matter is posted or on the work or other subject-matter itself.
(5) Subsection (1) does not apply if the educational institution or person acting under its authority knows or should have known that the work or other subject-matter was made available through the Internet without the consent of the copyright owner.
Via Ariel Katz and Howard Knopf on twitter:
Access copyright released a statement today announcing that negotiators failed to reach an agreement on licensing, and the University of Toronto and Western University will be relying instead on fair dealing guidelines, individual permissions, and other licensing for copyright clearance of their course material. We wish them well.
:: Next >>